2010 SDCC: Comic-Con Day 1

Note: I found this super old draft and decided to publish it as is. How much has changed in 15 years? Guess I’ll find out in a few weeks. . -7/10/2025

I survived the first day of the San Diego Comic-Con – yay!

Meme: “Remember when MTV played music videos?”

No, MTV did not have a presence at SDCC (that I know of), but it has been used as an example in several conversations of television channels that do not live up to their names. On the trolley to the Convention Center, I overheard some guys were chatting about tv channels about gaming, like G4 and Spike. At the con, there was grousing about the (lack of) science fiction on the SciFi/SyFy Channel both before and after its name change.

Of course, many people were once again decrying how Comic-Con isn’t about the comics anymore.

Lines

The lines were long this year. For the most part, they were well designed with lots of tents for the outside, until Sunday when the rules seemed to change. One guy told us that if you left the line for any reason, you would lost your place and have to go back to the end of line. Bah!

On Friday, I spent over 3+ hours in line for Ballroom 20 which is longer than the train ride from Los Angeles to San Diego. I felt compelled to stay in that room for at least as long as I spent in line. Luckily, I was interested in the panels in that room once I made it in: EW panel, True Blood, and the TV Guide Hot List. While in line, I missed The Big Bang Theory (which was one of the hottest properties this year), Caprica, the Joss Whedon Experience, Bones, and other stuff. Of those, people were most excited about BBT and JW.

I didn’t go into Hall H this year. Yes, I wanted to see some of the panels, but I just couldn’t handle the line after Ballroom 20.

Girl Power

I went to a bunch of lit and writing panels. The io9 panel was fun. It was great to put faces to names. Also, the first item lauded was Warren Ellis’ Freak Angels.

Despite all of the geeks are girls too, the media still needs to catch up. Girl geeks are finding their moment in the sun offends me, especially the line:

“I’m hearing from a lot of women who read it with their boyfriends,” [Blair] Butler says. “I think more guys like being able to share that experience.”

NOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooo!

After the ### panel, I had thought about revising my rant. Maybe it wasn’t necessary any more. Girls were accepted in comics as readers, creators, and purveyors.

And then there is this Best Buy/Geek Squad commercial:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFe_641Gbog]

Later came the “Kiss Them or Kill Them panel.” I thought it would be philosophical in nature about violence, writing attack scenes, and villainy. Nope, Mysterious Galaxy should have gone with the title “slayer or lay her?” (Yes I still love the -er jokes.) it was the paranormal romance/urban fantasy panel and really about sex with monsters. Most of the authors were women with 2 token men, one of whom writes under his initials. I think that this replicates the secrets of the 19th cenutry romance fiction industry when authors had to be perceived as “female” to get publishes. On the flip side, the next panel on “Twisting Genres” was mostly male with one token female (Naomi Novik.) I don’t want to be noticing this type of gender and genretyping in the 21st century!

Hugo Awards 2025: Best Short Story

My reading choices and nominations were not in synch with the 2025 Hugo ballot. Before receiving the packet, I had only read 1 of the novellas and one of the best series. A couple of the items were on my TBR, such a A Sorceress Comes to Call and Sheine Lende.

Needless to say, I did not read everything on the ballot. I did not even try to read all of the items nominated for Best Novel, Best Novella, Astounding, and Lodestar.

Today, I finished reading all of the short stories. Most of them were about communicating history through stories, which I love. Here are my rankings:

  1. “We Will Teach You How to Read | We Will Teach You How to Read” by Caroline M. Yoachim
  2. “Stitched to Skin Like Family Is” by Nghi Vo
  3. “Five Views of the Planet Tartarus” by Rachael K. Jones
  4. “Why Don’t We Just Kill the Kid in the Omelas Hole” by Isabel J. Kim
  5. “Three Faces of a Beheading” by Arkady Martine
  6. “Marginalia” by Mary Robinette Kowal

I loved shaped poetry and linguistics and playing around with form, so the Yoachim story felt like it was made for me. It felt like reading a vocal composition that starts with 1 voice and slowly adds in more. To me, it reads as a poem, but it’s not category fraud since the author intended it to be a short story.

Vo’s story is much more conventional. A woman who can read the history of clothes through touch is hitchhiking through the Midwest during the Great Depression, searching for her brother, She paints each scene using few but so very evocative words. It left me satisfied and wanting more.

The flash fiction by Jones is a gut punch.

I really wanted to like the other three stories. They sounded like they would be my jam. I didn’t vibe with the casual narration of the Omelas story. On the other hand, Martine’s was too formal. But it has footnotes. Footnotes!

And I have loved most of Kowal’s other work, but this short story made the fatal mistake of stopping not ending. I stopped reading short stories on a regular basis because so many of them lacked conclusions. Especially when the character or plot stops abruptly, followed by a lyrical paragraph or flourish that rarely illuminates any themes of motifs or actions.

I loved this world with giant marauding snails. But a big event happens, the main character does not get to react or make a decision or action. And suddenly there is a paragraph about the snails. Nope. Also, the title of the story did not make any sense to me, other than being a play on the main character’s name, Margery. Double nope. With the title word “marginalia” I expected something either with manuscripts or writing or annotations. Honestly it would be a good alternate title for Martine’s story,

So, yeah, I get annoyed when a writer I really like commits this sin.

Welcome to the New Site, Same as the Old Site

I made some long overdue changes on the backend. The most important changes are that heathercleary.net and heathercleary.com now:

  • point to the same place
  • can be reliably accessed via HTTPS

You may notice that I am still using the same theme. I don’t care that it is old-fashioned. I love the simple layout and the header image of Edwin Land.

Rules for Bread Making

My mom sent me a scan of my [great] Aunt Gertrude’s bread recipe, probably based on the one she learned in in her high school home economics class (circa 1910s late 1920s in Taney County, Missouri.)

Most of the recipe is practical advice for technique. My grandma (Gertrude’s sister)  never formally taught me (or my mom or my siblings) how to bake. Which was a crying shame because she was a damn fine cook! When Bertha let me observe her in the kitchen, her “lessons” consisted of a list of ingredients and “add enough X until Y happens.” She rarely referred to a cookbook. (That said, I still have her beat-up copy of Better Homes and Gardens.)

Continue reading